Thursday, September 23, 2010
Shuster Presents A Pledge to America
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
Tomorrow Marks the 6th Month Anniversary of Obamacare - A Look at the Numbers
Six months after enactment of the Democrats’ new health care law, a look at the first stages of its implementation reveals how the legislation falls short with respect to costs, premiums, preserving Americans’ existing coverage, and providing full transparency and accountability:
4,103—Pages of regulations issued on the health care law through September 17, 2010
12—Number of final regulations not subjected to public scrutiny before taking effect
5—Missed implementation deadlines to date
16—Unanswered letters from House and Senate Republicans to the Administration on the health law
22—States that have joined legal actions to block all or part of the law from taking effect
667,680—Number of Missouri voters that rejected the health care law’s individual mandate, supporting a ballot referendum objecting to the federal law by a 71%-29% margin
500,000—Individuals with pre-existing conditions who could be denied coverage due to under-funding of the law’s high-risk pool program, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO)
40,000,000—Firms subject to the health law’s new 1099 reporting requirements, which the National Federation of Independent Business called a “tremendous new paperwork compliance burden”
9—Regulations released to date that will increase premium costs for individuals and employers, according to the Administration’s own estimates
$2,500—Premium reduction promised by candidate Obama “by the end of my first term as President”
750,000—Reduction in the American labor force due to provisions in the law that “will effectively increase marginal tax rates, which will also discourage work,” according to the CBO
$310,800,000,000—Projected increase in health care costs as a direct result of the legislation, according to the Administration’s own actuaries
7,400,000—Reduction in Medicare Advantage enrollment as a result of the health care law, resulting in a loss of choice for seniors and millions of beneficiaries losing their current health plan
51%—Percentage of American workers who will lose their current health coverage by 2013, according to the Administration’s own estimates
0—Public hearings held before President Obama appointed Dr. Donald Berwick—an advocate of health care rationing—to head an agency that “finances health care for one in three Americans” and spends $800 billion annually
Even though we have seen only a few of the law’s initial provisions take effect, the impact can already be felt by American families and businesses, who face higher costs, economic uncertainty, and loss of their current coverage. How much longer will these ill effects persist before the President and Democrats in Congress admit that their legislation will harm, not help, the American people?
Friday, August 27, 2010
Shuster Delivers First-Hand Account of Security Situation in Afghanistan
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Thursday, July 15, 2010
Shuster Condemns Federally Funded Abortions in Pennsylvania
NRLC Report Shows Pennsylvania will Receive $160 Million in Health Care Funding for Abortion
On Tuesday, the National Right to Life Committee revealed a troubling discovery; a new $160 million federally funded high risk pool health insurance plan established in Pennsylvania will cover abortion. This makes Pennsylvania the first state to receive federal funds for abortion under the health care reform law.
Congressman Shuster joined members of the pro-life community today to condemn this revelation and further express his opposition to federally funded abortions.
“It is morally wrong to support the destruction of unborn life and it is ethically wrong for the federal government to coerce Americans who oppose abortion to fund the practice through their own tax dollars,” Shuster said. “During the healthcare debate, President Obama said he would not support taxpayer funded abortion, but this week’s announcement proves his words were only lip service to move his liberal agenda forward.”
“It has long been the objective of the left to establish abortion as a federally funded right,” Shuster added. “Yesterday’s discovery by the National Right to Life Committee proves that this White House, with the support of Governor Rendell and pro-abortion pressure groups are committed to subverting the will of the American people and the spirit of the promises made when health care reform became law.”
“It gives the pro-life community reason to pause when the President of the United States lies to his constituents by saying, ‘no federal funds will be used to pay for abortions.’ It shows the worthlessness of his executive order prohibiting tax-payer funding of abortion through his health care program. It is our hope that a new Congress will repeal Obamacare and re-institute the Hyde Amendment,” said Scott Manganella of the pro-life organization Precious Life.
Linda Barr with Pregnancy Ministries of Franklin County added: "As a pro-life pregnancy resource center, we do not consider abortion to be health care. There are supportive services and adoption options available that preserve life rather than destroy it."